Professional development of academics as teachers (Feixas, M, 2010)
Dimensions | Professor as Senior Learner | Professor with a main focus on Content Teaching | Professor with a main focus on Students’ Learning |
TEACHERS CONCERNS | |||
Concerns | – Master content
– Control anxiety, insecurity – Surviving daily teaching – Opinion and impression brought about in students – Not being able to meet the expected requirements and responsibilities of a university teacher – Socializing into the university department |
– Master teaching abilities
– Transmit content and present material in a comprehensive and motivating manner – Create interest in the subject – Time restrictions, not being able to cover all the programme – Students not acquiring the main concepts of the course, not finishing the course in a well-documented manner |
– Focus on results, on teaching impact
– Turn students into independent learners – Let them learn how to learn on their own – Find the most appropriate teaching model for their students to learn – Know what and how the students are learning; how to contribute to their learning – Adapting the teaching style to reach the different students’ learning styles – Satisfy students educational needs in a more personalized manner – Know the impact of one’s own teaching on the students’ learning |
CONCEPTIONS ABOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING | |||
Conceptions about Teaching | – Teaching seen as the transmission of information and of the main concepts of the programme | – Teaching seen as the transmission of the teacher’s knowledge | – Teaching seen as helping students to change and to develop their own conceptions about the subject matter |
Conceptions about Learning | – Learning seen as the acquisition of knowledge | – Learning seen as the acquisition of teachers’ own knowledge | – Learning seen as the restructuring of the students’ knowledge, as a conceptual development. |
CURRICULUM DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT | |||
Planning | – Content of the programme and didactic strategies used are suggested by a supervisor or mentor
– Exhaustive planning of each session and of the necessary material – Avoids explaining what he/she does not understand or is poorly developed – Rarely takes into consideration students’ previous knowledge |
– Instructional decisions are made based on his/her interests and understanding of what is convenient for the students
– Course structured in a way that students know what they need to study to pass it – Students know little about the course to be taught – Teachers’ professional experience is essential to help students contextualize the course content |
– Content and teaching and learning strategies are discussed and can be negotiated
– Flexible planning, based on the particular interests of the majority of students – Instructional decisions are taken from the groups’ interests – Analysis of the students’ previous knowledge and experiences – Students’ experiences are as important as teachers’ experiences |
Teaching and Learning Strategies | – Use of teaching and learning strategies employed by his/her previous teachers that were deemed to be outstanding
– Sceptical in terms of deciding on classroom dynamics that are not familiar – Use of resources to make sessions more innovative |
– Repertoire is mainly based on lectures
– Aims to cover what can be found in a textbook – Students’ questions are a sign of interest and are used to prove the mastery of the content – Little experimentation with new methods and materials if those used are already working |
– Having to work through different strategies may imply not covering all the material
– Relinquishes time of the session to discuss changes of conceptions and to question their ideas – Use of learning to learn strategies – Chooses the most appropriate didactic material addressed to students’ learning needs – Students’ questions as a opportunity to find out what students are doing, thinking or where difficulties lie |
Assessment | – Suggested assessment system or received system by former teachers
– Do not reflect too much on whether it is the most appropriate for the students and the course |
– Assessment aims to find out whether students have understood and acquired main concepts
– Mainly summative assessment and based on a final exam |
– Assessment as an opportunity for the students to reveal whether a change of conception in the comprehension of the subject’s conception has occurred
– Mainly formative, willing to know how the learning process is taking place |
DISCOURSE LEVEL | |||
Discourse | – Technical vocabulary is rudimentary
– Discourse is colloquial and informal. – Simplistic explanations. |
– Precise and fluent discourse. Use of chosen examples, anecdotes, metaphors and references to professional and personal experience | – Academic discourse which connects with that of the group of students.
– Use of examples and references tailored to students’ learning concerns and/or difficulties |
RELATIONSHIP WITH STUDENTS | |||
Relationship with students | – Compromised with students, sometimes vulnerable.
– Intense and personal. Student as friend, victim or enemy – Close relationship due to an identification with students’ demands – Student seen as the evaluator of teacher’s own effectiveness – Students’ evaluation reflects teacher’s inexperience |
– Distant and analytical relationship.
– Students as receptive; take notes of everything – Few contributions and little participation |
– Interpersonal relationship is an important resource from which to work to achieve good learning in the subject.
– Students as unique subjects. Professional compromise, based on sincerity, dynamism and intersubjectivity. – Getting to know the student is important, but it is more important to know how to interact with each other. Interpersonal relationship as a resource to work and get students to learn |